Page 1 of 1
Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 6:48 pm
by Temor
Would it be possible to raise the height limit to 150px?
I have a ton of sweet 150px signatures, but I'm not able to use them
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 6:55 pm
by jacek
Sorry but 150px is just too big in my opinion,
The focus should be the actual topic, not the flashy images in peoples signatures.
You can always make the ones you have a bit smaller
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 6:58 pm
by Temor
jacek wrote:Sorry but 150px is just too big in my opinion,
The focus should be the actual topic, not the flashy images in peoples signatures.
You can always make the ones you have a bit smaller
Making them smaller would make them look terrible. But I fully understand you
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 6:59 pm
by EcazS
Temor wrote:
Making them smaller would make them look terrible. But I fully understand you
Shouldn't make much of a difference if you scale down both width and height. Unless they're HUUGE
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:35 pm
by Temor
EcazS wrote:Temor wrote:
Making them smaller would make them look terrible. But I fully understand you
Shouldn't make much of a difference if you scale down both width and height. Unless they're HUUGE
The thing is, some of them are animated gifs ( waves on water etc ) and those animations get totally messed up when resizing, and I really don't feel like redoing them entirely
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:40 pm
by Dylan
Temor wrote:
Making them smaller would make them look terrible. But I fully understand you
Generally speaking down sizing images doesn't compromise the quality overly, if the aspect ratio is maintained and is done using a program with a feature to keep the quality (i.e. Photoshop.) The problem should only arise if:
1) They are overly large (but you said only 150px high. OR
2) They have a great amount of small minute details, in which case I have no solution.
Just saying.
EDIT: just saw your other post, I suppose animations would potentially not look so good in a resized nature. But other than the GIF's they should be fine
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:45 pm
by Temor
Dylan wrote:Temor wrote:
Making them smaller would make them look terrible. But I fully understand you
Generally speaking down sizing images doesn't compromise the quality overly, if the aspect ratio is maintained and is done using a program with a feature to keep the quality (i.e. Photoshop.) The problem should only arise if:
1) They are overly large (but you said only 150px high. OR
2) They have a great amount of small minute details, in which case I have no solution.
Just saying.
EDIT: just saw your other post, I suppose animations would potentially not look so good in a resized nature. But other than the GIF's they should be fine
I do have tons of signatures I can resize, but I really want my animated sigs
Especially this one:
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:48 pm
by Dylan
Temor wrote:
I do have tons of signatures I can resize, but I really want my animated sigs
Especially this one:
Well you could always be a terribly annoying person, who bends the rules and posts it at the bottom of every single one of your posts
I'd have to advise against that though as it is loop holing the rules and would be quite obnoxious ahaha.
There are other ways to get by the size limit too, but again against the rules which are in place for a reason. Sorry!
On a side note, that is a really nice picture.
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:50 pm
by EcazS
Is it a beaver or a bear?
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:56 pm
by Temor
Dylan wrote:Temor wrote:
I do have tons of signatures I can resize, but I really want my animated sigs
Especially this one:
Well you could always be a terribly annoying person, who bends the rules and posts it at the bottom of every single one of your posts
I'd have to advise against that though as it is loop holing the rules and would be quite obnoxious ahaha.
There are other ways to get by the size limit too, but again against the rules which are in place for a reason. Sorry!
On a side note, that is a really nice picture.
Yeah, there's a thousand ways to get around the limit, but as you said, the rules are there for a reason.
Thank you
Took me FOREVER to make
EcazS wrote:Is it a beaver or a bear?
It's a bear !!
Do you know how hard it is to get a good render of a bear drinking? I do!
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 8:15 pm
by jacek
You could just crop it I guess, 50px isn’t THAT much to lose.
Also, new rule, nothing that flashes or sparkles is allowed anywhere at all ever !
Things like the above are fine though
(if they are small enough
I will have to write that rules post *yawn*
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 8:38 pm
by Dylan
jacek wrote:You could just crop it I guess, 50px isn’t THAT much to lose.
Also, new rule, nothing that flashes or sparkles is allowed anywhere at all ever !
Things like the above are fine though
(if they are small enough
I will have to write that rules post *yawn*
I love this rule!
The web was not made for *cough* ugly *cough* sparkly GIFs to take over; and people think they look good!
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 8:51 pm
by Temor
jacek wrote:You could just crop it I guess, 50px isn’t THAT much to lose.
Also, new rule, nothing that flashes or sparkles is allowed anywhere at all ever !
Things like the above are fine though
(if they are small enough
I will have to write that rules post *yawn*
Best
Rule
Ever.
Period.
Re: Signatures
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 9:54 pm
by jacek
I thought that was a pretty common rule